Otoplasty


Article Author:
Kenneth Kennedy


Article Editor:
Ziad Katrib


Editors In Chief:
Brian Downs
Ziad Katrib


Managing Editors:
Avais Raja
Orawan Chaigasame
Khalid Alsayouri
Kyle Blair
Radia Jamil
Erin Hughes
Patrick Le
Anoosh Zafar Gondal
Saad Nazir
William Gossman
Hassam Zulfiqar
Navid Mahabadi
Hussain Sajjad
Steve Bhimji
Muhammad Hashmi
John Shell
Matthew Varacallo
Heba Mahdy
Ahmad Malik
Abbey Smiley
Sarosh Vaqar
Mark Pellegrini
James Hughes
Beenish Sohail
Hajira Basit
Phillip Hynes
Sandeep Sekhon


Updated:
6/1/2019 11:10:56 PM

Introduction

Furnas described otoplasty in 1959 with the technique of using permanent sutures on the conchomastoid to correct the deformity of prominauris.[1]  Mustarde added an additional technique in 1962 which described using permanent conchoscaphal sutures to improve the appearance of the ear.[2]  This review focuses on the primary indication for otoplasty, prominauris.

Anatomy

Before surgical correction of the ear, a fundamental understanding of the embryology and anatomy is necessary.  Development of the ear begins with the otic placode which presents during the 3rd week of gestation. Cartilage formation is present in week 7.  The hillocks of His fuse by week 12 and the antihelix then furls between weeks 12 to 16. Finally, the helix furls at 6 months. The hillocks of His are numbered one to six, and they include tragus, helical crus, helix, antihelix, antitragus, and lobule.[3]  The first three hillocks derive from the first pharyngeal arch, and the hillocks 4, 5, and 6 derive from the second pharyngeal arch.

Indications

To understand the indications for performing otoplasty, one must appreciate facial analysis.  The pinna is ideally positioned approximately 15 to 20 mm from the helical rim to the scalp. Prominauris, which is the main indication for performing otoplasty, is seen when the auriculocephalic angle is greater than 30 degrees.  The ideal auriculocephalic angle ranges from 20 to 30 degrees. Additionally, the vertical height of the ear should be approximately six centimeters.[4]  The width of the external ear should accordingly be about 55% of his length, averaging about 35 millimeters.  The distance between the lateral helix to mastoid skin should be approximately 2 to 2.5 centimeters.[5]  Upon further facial analysis, parallel lines can be drawn in the plane of the nasal dorsum and the long axis of the ear.  The external ear should have about 15 degrees of posterior rotation from the vertical plane. The length of the ear should be equal to the length of the nose from the nasion to the subnasale.  Also, the superior edge of the ear should lie at the level of the eyebrow, and the inferior edge should lie at the level of the nasal ala. The conchomastoid angle should be approximately 90 degrees, and the conchoscaphalic angle should be 90 degrees.[4]  The skin of the external ear is tightly adherent to the underlying cartilage anteriorly and loosely attached posteriorly.

Innervation of the external ear is elaborate and involves multiple cranial nerves which include: auriculotemporal nerve from the trigeminal nerve, facial nerve, glossopharyngeal nerve, Arnold’s nerve from the vagus nerve, and nerves from the second and third cervical plexus.[5]  As a result, adequate local anesthesia can be difficult to achieve.  The external ear receives vascular supply by the superficial temporal artery, the posterior auricular artery, and the lesser occipital arteries.  Prominauris is the primary indication for otoplasty, and as such is seen in approximately 5% of Caucasians.[6]  This auricular condition can be inherited in an autosomal dominant fashion, and many patients report a family history.  The etiology of prominauris is related to two main factors which are a poorly developed antihelical fold and excessive conchal cartilage.  The most common cause is the poorly developed antihelical fold with excessive conchal cartilage being the second most common cause. The surgery should be performed at 5 to 6 years old when the ear has reached 90% of its adult size, and the cartilage has increased in stiffness.

Technique

The Mustarde technique treats the underdeveloped antihelical fold.  When examining the ear the surgeon should apply gentle pressure to form the planned antihelical fold.  Then mattress suture points should be marked 8 mm on each side of the new antihelical fold. Hydrodissection with local anesthetic is critical to promote anesthesia and hemostasis; 1% local lidocaine with epinephrine 1 to 100,000 is typically an acceptable local anesthetic. Cartilage tattoo can be performed with methylene blue to mark the cartilage site of suturing.  A postauricular incision is made to provide access for the sutures. There is an option to score the cartilage which can help weaken it to ensure that the cartilage loses its elasticity. The horizontal mattress sutures should include three separate sutures from superior to inferior about 10 mm apart.[2]  The Furnas technique focuses on correcting excessive conchal cartilage.  This technique involves using roughly four permanent conchomastoid sutures. These sutures need to go through the lateral perichondrium to the mastoid periosteum while avoiding the anterior conchal skin.[1]  The Davis technique, which involves removing conchal cartilage to treat excessive cartilage, may also be a surgical option.[5]  The postoperative dressing should include a xeroform gauze which is tightly packed around the external ear followed by padding with fluffs and a mastoid dressing which does not cover the eyes. Most dressings should be removed on postoperative day one to ensure that there is no hematoma.

Complications

Complications largely divide into early and late complications.  Early complications involve hematoma, bleeding, postoperative infections including perichondritis, dehiscence, and necrosis of the skin.  The most worrisome postoperative complication is a hematoma. Hematoma formation can lead to cartilage and skin necrosis. If not addressed immediately, the hematoma can progress to infection which could worsen cartilage necrosis and lead to cauliflower deformity. Cartilage necrosis can also result from over tightening of the sutures and sometimes excessive pressure from the dressing. Postoperative hematomas are usually seen between one to three days after surgery. Pain is one of the main symptoms and should prompt a timely examination.

Other late complications include excessive scarring suture extrusion, hypersensitivity, and most importantly poor aesthetic outcomes. Unsatisfactory aesthetic outcomes are the most common complication of otoplasty.[5]  The aesthetic complications are notable. The telephone ear deformity is related to the overcorrection of the middle mattress suture relative to the superior and inferior sutures.  The reverse telephone ear results from over tightening the inferior and superior Mustarde sutures. The vertical post deformity is a result of improperly placed sutures which leaves a sharp vertical fold in the antihelix.  The hidden helix complication is another result of overtightening the Mustarde sutures so that the antihelix is not visible from an anterior facial view.[5]

Clinical Significance

A proper understanding of the diagnosis, indications, and surgical techniques will lead to positive outcomes in otoplasty.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

The correction of prominauris has traditionally been under the specialties of plastic surgery and otolaryngology. Although otoplasty is typically an outpatient procedure, it still requires a team approach. The child’s pediatrician most often refers these patients to the surgeon, which requires an understanding of the diagnosis and direct communication with the surgical practice, as well as knowledge of the appropriate timing of referral and repair. If a wound infection and subsequent perichondritis were to develop, consulting with an infectious disease pharmacist may also be warranted to help guide antibiotic selection. The earlier a complication is recognized, the better the prognosis and subsequent cosmetic outcome (Level V).


Interested in Participating?

We are looking for contributors to author, edit, and peer review our vast library of review articles and multiple choice questions. In as little as 2-3 hours you can make a significant contribution to your specialty. In return for a small amount of your time, you will receive free access to all content and you will be published as an author or editor in eBooks, apps, online CME/CE activities, and an online Learning Management System for students, teachers, and program directors that allows access to review materials in over 500 specialties.

Improve Content - Become an Author or Editor

This is an academic project designed to provide inexpensive peer-reviewed Apps, eBooks, and very soon an online CME/CE system to help students identify weaknesses and improve knowledge. We would like you to consider being an author or editor. Please click here to learn more. Thank you for you for your interest, the StatPearls Publishing Editorial Team.

Otoplasty - Questions

Take a quiz of the questions on this article.

Take Quiz
A mother of a 7-year-old child was concerned about the protruding ears of her son. Otoplasty was performed to correct the deformity. While performing the surgery, horizontal mattress sutures were placed behind the ears to create antihelix fold. However, the surgeon was concerned about the poor aesthetic outcome that might occur due to the excessive correction of the middle horizontal mattress suture. The surgeon is most likely worried about which one of the following cosmetic complications?



Click Your Answer Below


Would you like to access teaching points and more information on this topic?

Improve Content - Become an Author or Editor and get free access to the entire database, free eBooks, as well as free CME/CE as it becomes available. If interested, please click on "Sign Up" to register.

Purchase- Want immediate access to questions, answers, and teaching points? They can be purchased above at Apps and eBooks.


Sign Up
A 26-year old male presents to a clinic for a followup after an otoplasty procedure which was done two weeks ago for correction of the right protruding ear. The patient is concerned about the poor aesthetic outcome of the surgery. On physical examination, the upper and lower portions of the right ear are pulled too close to the skull compared to the middle part, and the middle portion is more prominent. What is the most likely cause of this postoperative cosmetic deformity?



Click Your Answer Below


Would you like to access teaching points and more information on this topic?

Improve Content - Become an Author or Editor and get free access to the entire database, free eBooks, as well as free CME/CE as it becomes available. If interested, please click on "Sign Up" to register.

Purchase- Want immediate access to questions, answers, and teaching points? They can be purchased above at Apps and eBooks.


Sign Up
A 16-year-old male undergoes a cosmetic otoplasty for prominauris. The surgery goes well, but unfortunately, the patient returns for the postoperative visit with an erythematous, painful, and edematous external ear. Which of these antibiotics must be included for infection coverage?



Click Your Answer Below


Would you like to access teaching points and more information on this topic?

Improve Content - Become an Author or Editor and get free access to the entire database, free eBooks, as well as free CME/CE as it becomes available. If interested, please click on "Sign Up" to register.

Purchase- Want immediate access to questions, answers, and teaching points? They can be purchased above at Apps and eBooks.


Sign Up
A 17-year-old male undergoes cosmetic otoplasty for prominauris. The procedure goes well, but the patient returns for the postoperative visit upset because of the unnatural appearance of both of his ears from the anterior view. He states that his ears look like they are pulled too far back and he cannot see the edge of the ear from the frontal view. What surgical error resulted in this outcome?



Click Your Answer Below


Would you like to access teaching points and more information on this topic?

Improve Content - Become an Author or Editor and get free access to the entire database, free eBooks, as well as free CME/CE as it becomes available. If interested, please click on "Sign Up" to register.

Purchase- Want immediate access to questions, answers, and teaching points? They can be purchased above at Apps and eBooks.


Sign Up

Otoplasty - References

References

Furnas DW, Correction of prominent ears by conchamastoid sutures. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 1968 Sep;     [PubMed]
MUSTARDE JC, The correction of prominent ears using simple mattress sutures. British journal of plastic surgery. 1963 Apr;     [PubMed]
Bowden RE, Development of the middle and external ear in man. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine. 1977 Nov;     [PubMed]
Schneider AL,Sidle DM, Cosmetic Otoplasty. Facial plastic surgery clinics of North America. 2018 Feb;     [PubMed]
Salgarello M,Gasperoni C,Montagnese A,Farallo E, Otoplasty for prominent ears: a versatile combined technique to master the shape of the ear. Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2007 Aug;     [PubMed]
Janz BA,Cole P,Hollier LH Jr,Stal S, Treatment of prominent and constricted ear anomalies. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2009 Jul;     [PubMed]

Disclaimer

The intent of StatPearls is to provide practice questions and explanations to assist you in identifying and resolving knowledge deficits. These questions and explanations are not intended to be a source of the knowledge base of all of medicine, nor is it intended to be a board or certification review of Surgery-Facial Plastics. The authors or editors do not warrant the information is complete or accurate. The reader is encouraged to verify each answer and explanation in several references. All drug indications and dosages should be verified before administration.

StatPearls offers the most comprehensive database of free multiple-choice questions with explanations and short review chapters ever developed. This system helps physicians, medical students, dentists, nurses, pharmacists, and allied health professionals identify education deficits and learn new concepts. StatPearls is not a board or certification review system for Surgery-Facial Plastics, it is a learning system that you can use to help improve your knowledge base of medicine for life-long learning. StatPearls will help you identify your weaknesses so that when you are ready to study for a board or certification exam in Surgery-Facial Plastics, you will already be prepared.

Our content is updated continuously through a multi-step peer review process that will help you be prepared and review for a thorough knowledge of Surgery-Facial Plastics. When it is time for the Surgery-Facial Plastics board and certification exam, you will already be ready. Besides online study quizzes, we also publish our peer-reviewed content in eBooks and mobile Apps. We also offer inexpensive CME/CE, so our content can be used to attain education credits while you study Surgery-Facial Plastics.