Umbilical Cord Prolapse


Article Author:
Marina Boushra
Alicia Stone


Article Editor:
Kimberly Rathbun


Editors In Chief:
Casey Ciresi


Managing Editors:
Avais Raja
Orawan Chaigasame
Carrie Smith
Abdul Waheed
Khalid Alsayouri
Trevor Nezwek
Radia Jamil
Patrick Le
Anoosh Zafar Gondal
Saad Nazir
William Gossman
Hassam Zulfiqar
Hussain Sajjad
Steve Bhimji
Muhammad Hashmi
John Shell
Matthew Varacallo
Heba Mahdy
Ahmad Malik
Sarosh Vaqar
Mark Pellegrini
James Hughes
Beata Beatty
Beenish Sohail
Nazia Sadiq
Hajira Basit
Phillip Hynes


Updated:
6/1/2019 2:10:29 PM

Introduction

Umbilical cord prolapse (UCP) occurs when the umbilical cord exits the cervical opening before the fetal presenting part. It is a rare obstetric emergency that carries a high rate of potential fetal morbidity and mortality. Resultant compression of the cord by the descending fetus during delivery leads to fetal hypoxia and bradycardia, which can result in fetal death or permanent disability. Early recognition and intervention are paramount to the reduction of adverse outcomes in the fetus. 

Etiology

Certain features of pregnancy increase risk for the development of umbilical cord prolapse by preventing appropriate engagement of the presenting part with the pelvis. These include fetal malpresentation, multiple gestations, polyhydramnios, preterm rupture of membranes, intrauterine growth restriction, preterm delivery, and fetal and cord abnormalities.[1] Nearly half of the cases of umbilical cord prolapse can be attributable to iatrogenic causes.[2] Iatrogenic risk factors include amniotomy without an engaged fetal presenting part, attempted external cephalic version in the setting of ruptured membranes, amnioinfusion, placement of a fetal scalp electrode or intrauterine pressure catheter, or the use of a cervical ripening balloon.[1]

Epidemiology

Estimates of the incidence of umbilical cord prolapse range from 1.4 to 6.2 per 1000.[3] The majority of cases of umbilical cord prolapse occur in single gestation pregnancies; in twin gestations, the incidence increases in the second twin.[2] Most prolapses occur shortly after rupture of membranes; one study estimates that 57% occur within five minutes of membrane rupture while 67% occur within one hour of rupture.[2] The incidence of umbilical cord prolapse is on a downward trend, which is thought to be secondary to the widespread use of cesarean sections for many of the risk factors of cord prolapse, such as fetal malpresentation.[4][5] Decreasing rates of grand multiparity worldwide are also thought to contribute to the reduced incidence.[5]

History and Physical

The occurrence of fetal bradycardia in the setting of ruptured membranes should prompt immediate evaluation for potential cord prolapse. There are two forms of umbilical cord prolapse.[1] The first, overt prolapse, occurs when the cord exits the cervix before the fetal presenting part; the second, occult prolapse, occurs when the cord exits the cervix with the fetal presenting part.[1] In overt prolapse, the cord is palpable as a pulsating structure in the vaginal vault. In occult prolapse, the cord is not visible or palpable ahead of the fetal presenting part. In overt prolapse, the diagnosis is clinical and made by palpation of a pulsating structure in the vaginal vault or visibly protruding from the vaginal introitus; this is typically accompanied by fetal bradycardia or severe variable decelerations, though fetal heart rate changes only present in approximately two-thirds of cases.[2][6] In occult prolapse, only fetal heart rate abnormalities may appear, as the cord will not be palpable or visible on examination. The diagnosis should be a consideration in cases of unexplained fetal heart rate changes in the setting of recent membrane rupture or other maneuvers that increase the risk of prolapse (for example, placement of a fetal scalp electrode).[1]

Evaluation

Umbilical cord prolapse is a clinical diagnosis and should be considered in the case of fetal bradycardia or recurrent variable decelerations, especially if they occur immediately after rupture of membranes. The diagnosis is confirmed by palpation of a pulsatile mass in the vaginal vault. No radiographic or laboratory confirmation is available, and funic decompression should be attempted as soon as the diagnosis is suspected. Antenatal ultrasound for cord presentation has demonstrated to be a poor predictor of umbilical cord prolapse.[7]

Treatment / Management

The definitive management of umbilical cord prolapse is expedient delivery; this is usually by cesarean section. In rare cases, vaginal delivery or operative vaginal delivery may be faster and, thus, preferable, but this should only occur under the presence and guidance of an experienced obstetrician.[1]

Until delivery is possible, the cornerstone of management of umbilical cord prolapse is funic decompression, relieving the pressure on the cord by elevation of the fetal presenting part. Studies suggest that the interval to funic decompression may be more important to outcomes than interval to delivery.[8] Decompression should be done manually by the medical provider through the placement of their finger or hand in the vaginal vault and gentle elevation of the presenting part off the umbilical cord. The provider should be conscientious not to place any additional pressure on the cord, as this can cause vasospasm and worsen outcome.[9] Placement of the mother in steep Trendelenburg or knee-chest position can also aid in cord decompression. In cases of a potentially prolonged interval to delivery (i.e., the need for transfer to a hospital with obstetric capabilities), saline infusion into the bladder may aid in funic decompression and remove the need for continuous manual elevation by the provider.[10][11] If fetal decelerations persist, and delivery is not imminent, the administration of a tocolytic can be attempted to relieve pressure on the umbilical vessels and to improve placental perfusion, thereby improving blood flow to the fetus.[12][13] Reduction of the cord into the os, which was common before the widespread availability of cesarean sections, has been associated with increased fetal mortality and is not routinely recommended except in cases of an expected long interval to delivery where other maneuvers have failed.[1]

If the cord is visibly protruding from the introitus, it should remain warm and moist because the ambient temperature is significantly colder than the temperature in the uterus and can result in vasospasm of the umbilical arteries, contributing to fetal hypoxia.[1] One method described preventing this is the replacement of the cord into the vaginal vault followed by insertion of a moist tampon to keep it in place.[14]

In very rare cases of umbilical cord prolapse in peri-viable pregnancies, case studies exist that demonstrate that conservative management may allow the continuation of the pregnancy until reaching a more desirable gestational age.[9][15] However, a frank discussion should take place with the patient regarding the experimental nature of this treatment and its potential risks. 

Pre-viable gestational age, lethal fetal abnormalities, or fetal demise are not indications for expedient delivery, and instead, a dilation and evacuation or labor induction should be the therapeutic choice, dependent on gestational age or maternal preference.[5]

Differential Diagnosis

Potential causes of a palpable mass in the vaginal vault include fetal malpresentation.[1] Possible causes of severe, prolonged fetal bradycardia include maternal hypotension, uterine rupture, vasa previa, and abruptio placentae.[1]

Prognosis

The rate of fetal mortality in umbilical cord prolapse is estimated to be less than 10%.[9][2][4] This reduction is a drastic decrease from earlier estimates of mortality, which ranged from 32% to 47%, which researchers hypothesize is due to the increased availability of cesarean sections as well as advances in neonatal resuscitation.[1][9] Gestational age and location of prolapse (inside versus outside the hospital) are the two significant determinants of outcome in umbilical cord prolapse.[5] Cord prolapse that occurs outside the hospital carries an 18-fold increased risk of mortality.[6] Premature infants and those with low birth weights have an increased risk of perinatal complications and twice the mortality.[9] Death in these infants appears to be attributable to their underlying conditions and the preterm delivery necessitated by the prolapse rather than complications of the prolapse itself. 

Complications

Outcomes for umbilical cord prolapse have drastically improved in recent years.[4] Still, a diagnosis of umbilical cord prolapse carries a risk of fetal mortality. Though rare, surviving infants may develop complications secondary to asphyxia, including neonatal encephalopathy and cerebral palsy.[16][17][18]

Consultations

Emergent obstetric consultation is necessary for umbilical cord prolapse occurring in the emergency department. The attending clinicians should attempt maneuvers for funic decompression until definitive management is available. 

Deterrence and Patient Education

Many patients in wealthy countries are opting for childbirth at home under the supervision of a non-physician attendant such as a doula or midwife. Cases of umbilical cord prolapse that occur outside the hospital carry a nearly 20 times increased rate of mortality. As such, patients with increased risk of prolapses, such as those with fetal malpresentation or umbilical cord abnormalities, should be strongly discouraged from delivering outside of the hospital. Concentration on other portions of their birth plan, such as a silent birth or minimal pharmacologic intervention, may help these patients decide to deliver in the hospital. Since umbilical cord prolapse may happen in patients without risk factors, training for non-physician birth attendants in the early recognition and intervention in umbilical cord prolapse may lead to improved fetal outcomes in these cases. 

Patients themselves should also be counseled to recognize cord prolapse in the scenario of a gush of fluid followed by the feeling of vaginal pressure or something in the vagina. The patient should be instructed to call an ambulance, and assume a knee-chest position while waiting for help to arrive.

Given the iatrogenic risk factors for umbilical cord prolapse, physician education also has a role to play in decreasing the frequency of this condition. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends against routine amniotomy in normally-progressing labor unless needed for fetal monitoring.[19] If performing an amniotomy, engagement of the fetal head should be confirmed. In cases with risk of cord prolapse, for example, polyhydramnios or high fetal station, the amniotic sac may be ruptured with a needle rather than a hook to slow the flow of the amniotic fluid, though the efficacy of this technique has not been well-studied.[20]

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Knowledge of the risk factors for umbilical cord prolapse does not decrease its occurrence,[2] but such knowledge can help both healthcare providers including midwives, labor and delivery nurses, and the patient prepare for potential umbilical cord prolapse. In patients with risk factors for developing umbilical cord prolapses, such as breech presentation with desired vaginal delivery, frank discussion with the patient and her partner regarding the risk should be undertaken, and the recommendation is to plan the delivery at a healthcare center where emergent cesarean delivery is available. Patient counseling regarding the expected course of events in the case of umbilical cord prolapse in delivery may help the patient better understand the urgent nature of management before occurrence. Simulation team training exercises have been shown to decrease the time from diagnosis to delivery and improve fetal outcomes.[21][22][23]

Umbilical cord prolapse cases require an interprofessional team approach to care. This team includes physicians and specialists, as well as specialty-trained neonatal nursing staff. Through collaborative team communication, optimal care can be the result with the best possible patient outcomes for both the mother and the neonate. [Level V]


Interested in Participating?

We are looking for contributors to author, edit, and peer review our vast library of review articles and multiple choice questions. In as little as 2-3 hours you can make a significant contribution to your specialty. In return for a small amount of your time, you will receive free access to all content and you will be published as an author or editor in eBooks, apps, online CME/CE activities, and an online Learning Management System for students, teachers, and program directors that allows access to review materials in over 500 specialties.

Improve Content - Become an Author or Editor

This is an academic project designed to provide inexpensive peer-reviewed Apps, eBooks, and very soon an online CME/CE system to help students identify weaknesses and improve knowledge. We would like you to consider being an author or editor. Please click here to learn more. Thank you for you for your interest, the StatPearls Publishing Editorial Team.

Umbilical Cord Prolapse - Questions

Take a quiz of the questions on this article.

Take Quiz
A 35-year-old G5P4 woman at 27 weeks gestation presents to the emergency department with the complaint of a gush of fluids. She has not had any vaginal bleeding or contractions. Cervical examination is notable for a 6 cm dilated cervix and a pulsatile structure in the vaginal vault. Which of the following positions will aid in the management of this patient?

(Move Mouse on Image to Enlarge)
  • Image 4361 Not availableImage 4361 Not available
    Contributed by Wikimedia Commons, W. Smellie, 1792 (Public Domain)
Attributed To: Contributed by Wikimedia Commons, W. Smellie, 1792 (Public Domain)



Click Your Answer Below


Would you like to access teaching points and more information on this topic?

Improve Content - Become an Author or Editor and get free access to the entire database, free eBooks, as well as free CME/CE as it becomes available. If interested, please click on "Sign Up" to register.

Purchase- Want immediate access to questions, answers, and teaching points? They can be purchased above at Apps and eBooks.


Sign Up
A 34-year-old primigravida at 30 weeks gestation with no prenatal care presents to the emergency department with complaint of lower abdominal pressure. Her vital signs are within normal limits, and sterile vaginal examination reveals a pulsatile cord-like structure in the vaginal vault. The provider elevates the fetal presenting part, a foot. The patient is placed in steep Trendelenburg position. An emergent obstetrics consult is placed. Fetal monitoring continues to show severe decelerations. Which of the following is a potential next step in the management of this patient's condition?

(Move Mouse on Image to Enlarge)
  • Image 4361 Not availableImage 4361 Not available
    Contributed by Wikimedia Commons, W. Smellie, 1792 (Public Domain)
Attributed To: Contributed by Wikimedia Commons, W. Smellie, 1792 (Public Domain)



Click Your Answer Below


Would you like to access teaching points and more information on this topic?

Improve Content - Become an Author or Editor and get free access to the entire database, free eBooks, as well as free CME/CE as it becomes available. If interested, please click on "Sign Up" to register.

Purchase- Want immediate access to questions, answers, and teaching points? They can be purchased above at Apps and eBooks.


Sign Up
Which is the incorrect action for prolapsed cord during delivery?



Click Your Answer Below


Would you like to access teaching points and more information on this topic?

Improve Content - Become an Author or Editor and get free access to the entire database, free eBooks, as well as free CME/CE as it becomes available. If interested, please click on "Sign Up" to register.

Purchase- Want immediate access to questions, answers, and teaching points? They can be purchased above at Apps and eBooks.


Sign Up
A patient presents to the emergency department in active labor. Sterile vaginal examination is notable for a pulsating mass in the vault. Fetal monitoring shows severe, prolonged decelerations. What is the most appropriate next step in the management of this patient?



Click Your Answer Below


Would you like to access teaching points and more information on this topic?

Improve Content - Become an Author or Editor and get free access to the entire database, free eBooks, as well as free CME/CE as it becomes available. If interested, please click on "Sign Up" to register.

Purchase- Want immediate access to questions, answers, and teaching points? They can be purchased above at Apps and eBooks.


Sign Up
A novice nurse is making rounds in labor and delivery with their preceptor as part of a maternal-newborn clinical rotation. Mixed with nervousness, curiosity, and fear the nurse is attempting to focus on the wise words of their mentor regarding umbilical cord prolapse. The fact that the nursing student has a care plan due at post-conference tomorrow brings her back to the moment. What nursing interventions will the novice nurse list on the care plan regarding the management of this obstetric emergency? Select all that apply.



Click Your Answer Below


Would you like to access teaching points and more information on this topic?

Improve Content - Become an Author or Editor and get free access to the entire database, free eBooks, as well as free CME/CE as it becomes available. If interested, please click on "Sign Up" to register.

Purchase- Want immediate access to questions, answers, and teaching points? They can be purchased above at Apps and eBooks.


Sign Up
A 36-year-old, gravida 1 para 0 female at 38 weeks gestation presents with contractions. Her pregnancy has been complicated by preeclampsia and polyhydramnios. Sterile vaginal examination is notable for a 6 cm cervix with a 75% effacement. A pulsatile structure is palpated in the vaginal vault. Which of the following places the patient at increased risk for this condition?



Click Your Answer Below


Would you like to access teaching points and more information on this topic?

Improve Content - Become an Author or Editor and get free access to the entire database, free eBooks, as well as free CME/CE as it becomes available. If interested, please click on "Sign Up" to register.

Purchase- Want immediate access to questions, answers, and teaching points? They can be purchased above at Apps and eBooks.


Sign Up
A 25-year-old primigravida at 28 weeks' gestation presents due to concern that she “broke her water” after feeling a large gush of fluid about thirty minutes ago. She also complains of decreased fetal movement and has just noticed an increase in vaginal pressure. An exam reveals a pulsatile cord-like structure protruding from the patient’s vagina. Which of the following is the next best step in the management of this patient?



Click Your Answer Below


Would you like to access teaching points and more information on this topic?

Improve Content - Become an Author or Editor and get free access to the entire database, free eBooks, as well as free CME/CE as it becomes available. If interested, please click on "Sign Up" to register.

Purchase- Want immediate access to questions, answers, and teaching points? They can be purchased above at Apps and eBooks.


Sign Up
A 19-year-old G1 woman at 32 weeks gestation presents to a critical access emergency department with a complaint of gushing vaginal fluids. Sterile vaginal examination is notable for a fetal foot in the vaginal vault and a pulsatile structure protruding from the introitus. The patient is placed in steep Trendelenburg, and the provider elevates the fetal foot from the protruding umbilical cord. Fetal monitoring shows severe decelerations. Which of the following medications can be used to manage the patient's condition until transfer to a tertiary center can be arranged?



Click Your Answer Below


Would you like to access teaching points and more information on this topic?

Improve Content - Become an Author or Editor and get free access to the entire database, free eBooks, as well as free CME/CE as it becomes available. If interested, please click on "Sign Up" to register.

Purchase- Want immediate access to questions, answers, and teaching points? They can be purchased above at Apps and eBooks.


Sign Up

Umbilical Cord Prolapse - References

References

Kahana B,Sheiner E,Levy A,Lazer S,Mazor M, Umbilical cord prolapse and perinatal outcomes. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 2004 Feb;     [PubMed]
Murphy DJ,MacKenzie IZ, The mortality and morbidity associated with umbilical cord prolapse. British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 1995 Oct;     [PubMed]
Holbrook BD,Phelan ST, Umbilical cord prolapse. Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America. 2013 Mar;     [PubMed]
Lin MG, Umbilical cord prolapse. Obstetrical     [PubMed]
Gibbons C,O'Herlihy C,Murphy JF, Umbilical cord prolapse--changing patterns and improved outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2014 Dec;     [PubMed]
Koonings PP,Paul RH,Campbell K, Umbilical cord prolapse. A contemporary look. The Journal of reproductive medicine. 1990 Jul;     [PubMed]
Vago T, Umbilical cord prolapse. British medical journal. 1978 Jun 3;     [PubMed]
Caspi E,Lotan Y,Schreyer P, Prolapse of the cord: reduction of perinatal mortality by bladder instillation and cesarean section. Israel journal of medical sciences. 1983 Jun;     [PubMed]
Katz Z,Lancet M,Borenstein R, Management of labor with umbilical cord prolapse. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 1982 Jan 15;     [PubMed]
Leong A,Rao J,Opie G,Dobson P, Fetal survival after conservative management of cord prolapse for three weeks. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2004 Dec;     [PubMed]
Khan RS,Naru T,Nizami F, Umbilical cord prolapse--a review of diagnosis to delivery interval on perinatal and maternal outcome. JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association. 2007 Oct;     [PubMed]
Tan WC,Tan LK,Tan HK,Tan AS, Audit of 'crash' emergency caesarean sections due to cord prolapse in terms of response time and perinatal outcome. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore. 2003 Sep;     [PubMed]
Copson S,Calvert K,Raman P,Nathan E,Epee M, The effect of a multidisciplinary obstetric emergency team training program, the In Time course, on diagnosis to delivery interval following umbilical cord prolapse - A retrospective cohort study. The Australian     [PubMed]
Siassakos D,Hasafa Z,Sibanda T,Fox R,Donald F,Winter C,Draycott T, Retrospective cohort study of diagnosis-delivery interval with umbilical cord prolapse: the effect of team training. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2009 Jul;     [PubMed]
Barrett JM, Funic reduction for the management of umbilical cord prolapse. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 1991 Sep;     [PubMed]
Sayed Ahmed WA,Hamdy MA, Optimal management of umbilical cord prolapse. International journal of women's health. 2018;     [PubMed]
Ezra Y,Strasberg SR,Farine D, Does cord presentation on ultrasound predict cord prolapse? Gynecologic and obstetric investigation. 2003;     [PubMed]
Katz Z,Shoham Z,Lancet M,Blickstein I,Mogilner BM,Zalel Y, Management of labor with umbilical cord prolapse: a 5-year study. Obstetrics and gynecology. 1988 Aug;     [PubMed]
Hehir MP,Hartigan L,Mahony R, Perinatal death associated with umbilical cord prolapse. Journal of perinatal medicine. 2017 Jul 26;     [PubMed]
Hasegawa J,Sekizawa A,Ikeda T,Koresawa M,Ishiwata I,Kawabata M,Kinoshita K, Clinical risk factors for poor neonatal outcomes in umbilical cord prolapse. The journal of maternal-fetal     [PubMed]
Gilbert WM,Jacoby BN,Xing G,Danielsen B,Smith LH, Adverse obstetric events are associated with significant risk of cerebral palsy. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2010 Oct;     [PubMed]
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 766 Summary: Approaches to Limit Intervention During Labor and Birth. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2019 Feb;     [PubMed]
Koyama S,Tomimatsu T,Kanagawa T,Tsutsui T,Kimura T, The amnioscope strikes back as a useful device for pinhole amniotomy in the management of polyhydramnios. AJP reports. 2011 Dec;     [PubMed]

Disclaimer

The intent of StatPearls is to provide practice questions and explanations to assist you in identifying and resolving knowledge deficits. These questions and explanations are not intended to be a source of the knowledge base of all of medicine, nor is it intended to be a board or certification review of Nurse-Corrections (CCN). The authors or editors do not warrant the information is complete or accurate. The reader is encouraged to verify each answer and explanation in several references. All drug indications and dosages should be verified before administration.

StatPearls offers the most comprehensive database of free multiple-choice questions with explanations and short review chapters ever developed. This system helps physicians, medical students, dentists, nurses, pharmacists, and allied health professionals identify education deficits and learn new concepts. StatPearls is not a board or certification review system for Nurse-Corrections (CCN), it is a learning system that you can use to help improve your knowledge base of medicine for life-long learning. StatPearls will help you identify your weaknesses so that when you are ready to study for a board or certification exam in Nurse-Corrections (CCN), you will already be prepared.

Our content is updated continuously through a multi-step peer review process that will help you be prepared and review for a thorough knowledge of Nurse-Corrections (CCN). When it is time for the Nurse-Corrections (CCN) board and certification exam, you will already be ready. Besides online study quizzes, we also publish our peer-reviewed content in eBooks and mobile Apps. We also offer inexpensive CME/CE, so our content can be used to attain education credits while you study Nurse-Corrections (CCN).