Electronic Delivery (Vaping) Of Cannabis And Nicotine

Article Author:
Cody Civiletto
Sunny Aslam

Article Editor:
Julia Hutchison

Editors In Chief:
Alexandra Caley
Sameh Boktor

Managing Editors:
Avais Raja
Orawan Chaigasame
Carrie Smith
Abdul Waheed
Khalid Alsayouri
Trevor Nezwek
Radia Jamil
Erin Hughes
Patrick Le
Anoosh Zafar Gondal
Saad Nazir
William Gossman
Hassam Zulfiqar
Hussain Sajjad
Steve Bhimji
Muhammad Hashmi
John Shell
Matthew Varacallo
Heba Mahdy
Ahmad Malik
Sarosh Vaqar
Mark Pellegrini
James Hughes
Beata Beatty
Beenish Sohail
Nazia Sadiq
Hajira Basit
Phillip Hynes

8/1/2019 7:22:40 PM


One of the latest public health controversies has centered around the introduction and the rising popularity of electronic nicotine delivery systems.  These devices most commonly called e-cigarettes or vaporizers, aerosolize various combinations of glycerol, propylene glycol, flavorings, nicotine, or cannabis to be inhaled by consumers. The marketing strategy for e-cigarettes is as a “healthier” alternative to traditional tobacco and a novel aid for smoking cessation with little data to support these claims.[1] For chronic tobacco users, these new devices may lead to harm reduction by reducing exposure to many of the harmful effects of tobacco smoke. On the other hand, novel nicotine users will experience increased harm from the known hazards of nicotine consumption and may also suffer from unknown adverse health effects of other additives found in e-cigarettes.[2] The biggest concern lies with use among adolescents and young adults. Early research suggests that e-cigarette use poses a higher risk for subsequent tobacco use later in youth and adulthood.[3] Other studies show increased rates of respiratory symptoms, i.e., chronic cough, wheezing, and bronchitis with long-term use.[4] Nicotine alone correlates with negative cardiovascular outcomes, including hypertension, coronary artery disease, and heart failure.[5] The majority of e-cigarette companies are subsidiaries of large tobacco companies, and perhaps the most nefarious concern lies with the ongoing efforts of tobacco corporations to rebrand themselves to target the developing “cash-cow” that is the vulnerable adolescent population.[6] Given the potential for benefit in specific populations and harm in others, more research is needed to delineate the accurate benefits of e-cigarettes as a smoking cessation aid versus the potential harm associated with long-term use.


Electronic nicotine delivery systems come in an array of designs. The primary differences are in nicotine concentration, the variety of additives and flavorings, battery type, and superficial aesthetics. The classic e-cigarette consists of a compact lithium-ion battery, a vaporization chamber, and a solvent mixture cartridge.[1] The liquid is heated in the chamber and subsequently evaporated followed by rapid cooling. The aerosol is then directly inhaled orally by the user via a mouthpiece and leads to direct systemic absorption through the respiratory system. There have been several generations of e-cigarettes models. The earlier designs closely resemble the classic cigarette and deliver lower levels of nicotine. The latest models contain larger cartridges, higher-powered batteries, and lower resistance coils, which enhance the concentration of nicotine consumed. Cartridges can be exchanged easily between or during usage.[1] 

Particularly popular among youth consumers are the “pod-mod” class of devices that resemble a slick and modern universal serial bus drive. These super-compact vaporizers can deliver highly concentrated puffs at levels that would be aversive to even chronic tobacco users.[7] Popular companies use nicotine formulations in their pod-mod devices that derive from the nicotine salts of loose-leaf tobacco. One pod of JUUL possesses the same amount of nicotine as twenty classic combustible cigarettes.[7] Nicotine salts, when combined with additives and flavorings, mask the noxious taste of the ultra-concentrated nicotine.[7] JUUL pods are about 9.4 by 1.5 by 0.8 centimeters and weigh approximately 0.01 kilograms.[7] The modern, ultra-compact, and customizable designs are slick pieces of technology and allow discreet transport of the pods. This concealability has become a hot area of contention in schools who struggle to prevent students from vaping in restrooms, hallways, and classrooms. Furthermore, commercial marketing targets children with colorful exteriors and sweet flavors such as bubble gum, Doritos, and hello kitty to seductively increase their grip on this vulnerable demographic.[7]

Issues of Concern

There are many constituents in the aerosols and liquids of e-cigarette cartridges. The most common include glycerol, propylene glycol, and nicotine. Micro-constituents that have been found in smaller concentrations include acrolein, formaldehyde, acetone, acetaldehyde, heavy metals, and many more.[1] Most of the ingredients in individual flavorings have not undergone testing for long-term safety. One study in animals showed that inhalation of aerosolized glycerol and propylene glycol was associated with local squamous metaplasia in the upper airways. Known carcinogens like the various aldehyde compounds have been found in lower, but still, present concentrations when compared to traditional cigarettes.[8] Heavy metals like chromium, nickel, and lead have also appeared in small quantities within the combustible vapor.[8] These metals have known carcinogenic effects and are also associated with inflammation and damage.[8] Varying manufacturing practices have shown discrepancies between levels of these compounds. Most research regarding exposure to e-cigarette aerosols has been completed either in vitro with cell cultures or in vivo with rodents. One study in mice looked at exposure to inhaled nicotine liquids and was associated with significant inflammation and oxidative stress to the pulmonary endothelium.[1] Other mouse studies have shown a reduction in endothelial glutathione levels and increased inflammatory cytokines.[1] Additionally, mice exposed to inhaled nicotine liquids showed higher rates of respiratory infections, including viruses and common bacteria.[1]

Due to the profound cardiovascular and respiratory harm induced by conventional cigarettes, it is crucial for further research to help reveal the short-term and long-term consequences of the new alternatives. Early studies suggest a short-term increase in vital signs such as blood pressure and heart rate. Other studies have shown that e-cigarette vapors induce platelet activation in the endothelium of healthy naïve participants.[1] Down the line, this could have implications for the risk of thrombosis.[5] The risk of long term e-cigarette use has had direct research on humans. However, the negative effect of nicotine alone such as that found in e-cigarettes has been shown to have short-term side effects including gastrointestinal distress, palpitations, and headache.[1] If absorbed in a large enough dose, nicotine can cause seizures, respiratory depression, and severe bradycardia.[1] Doses tolerable to adults can be life-threatening if consumed by small children. It is easy to see how a sweet cartridge of flavor may be tempting to a young child and present as a toxic hazard.[9]

Furthermore, exposure to any form of nicotine has been shown to impair the development of neural circuits and to lead to a permanent impairment of neurochemical and behavioral functioning.[10] Teens and young adults are of particular concern for neurologic harm from the nicotine in e-cigarettes because the human brain does not cease development until the mid-twenties. Some epidemiologic studies suggest that women who consume nicotine during pregnancy risk neurotoxic effects on the developing fetus.[10] The cholinergic system of the central nervous system is spread throughout the body and is vital for cognitive processes such as memory, attention, and executive processing. Nicotine itself can cross the placenta and bind to fetal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.[10] Evidence also exists that exposure to prenatal tobacco may harm fetal lung maturity, reduce lung compliance, impair overall lung function in infants, and possibly increase the risk of sudden infant death syndrome.[10] Many women who were chronic cigarette users before becoming pregnant switch to e-cigarettes to reduce their exposure. This switch may have benefits, but it does not subvert the independent harm of nicotine that is further compounded by the increasing concentrations found in certain devices.

Much anecdotal evidence exists suggesting e-cigarettes have associations with the development of chronic respiratory symptoms. [4] Some components of the nicotine aerosol already have known pulmonary toxicity, as previously mentioned. One study evaluated the association of adolescent e-cigarette use and symptoms of chronic bronchitis.[4] Adolescents who currently consumed e-cigarette aerosols had a two-fold increase (odds ratio, 2.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.42-2.88) in bronchitic symptoms (cough, wheezing, etc.) when compared to never users.[4] This effect persisted after adjusting for confounders such as concurrent and past cigarette usage among the participants (odds ratio, 1.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-2.59).[4] Overall, more research is needed, but to date, there is evidence to support the negative health consequences for e-cigarette use in novel users and particularly adolescent consumers. 

Clinical Significance

E-cigarettes are frequently cited as smoking cessation and reduction aids by vendors. However, little solid evidence has been published to date to support such a claim. However, one study out of the UK and published in the New England Journal of Medicine randomized 886 participants into two separate treatment groups.[2] One group used standard nicotine replacement products (i.e., patches and pills) and the other used an e-cigarette starter pack.  Both groups received behavioral support and counseling. The primary outcome evaluated was the abstinence rate after one year. E-cigarettes showed a statistically significant increase in abstinence rates (8.1%) when compared to the nicotine replacement group.[2] The study utilized a population of smokers pre-motivated to quit and also provided them with ample resources and behavioral support, making the study less generalizable to the public.[2] However, results of this one study suggest in the appropriate environment, and with the proper support, patients who are heavy smokers may benefit from switching to electronic nicotine systems to reduce the adverse symptoms of exposure to cigarette smoke. 

Since there is unclear clinical guidance, clinicians may struggle to advise patients on if and how to weave e-cigarettes into their treatment plans. Most experts take the harm reduction approach. FDA approved aids are suggested first due to their established efficacy and safety.[11] E-cigarettes can be utilized second if other aids have failed or patients are insistent. Patients should use flavorless liquids to minimize additives and their unknown effects. Patients should also avoid secondhand vaping indoors and around children because the effects of second and third-hand exposures to these products are also unclear. Lastly, it’s important to emphasize the lack of evidence of the long-term use of these devices and to provide emotional and behavioral support during the process.[11]

Other Issues

Overall rates of cigarette usage were declining among high-school students before e-cigarettes entered the market in 2007. [6] Anti-tobacco campaigns appeared to be highly effective in addition to public health restrictions on the packaging, advertisement, taxation, and promotion of tobacco products. For example, since 2009, the FDA has prohibited the advertising of tobacco products on television and radio platforms. Many states and local communities have banned cigarette use in public areas such as restaurants and bars. Attitudes towards smoking among adolescents have also shifted in the past couple of decades, and public health campaigns have succeeded in labeling cigarette use as unglamorous and unappealing. Unfortunately, attitudes towards e-cigarettes are not the same. Approximately 20% of high school youth now use some form of e-cigarette device and far less view these products as dangerous when compared to traditional cigarettes.[6] Nearly all e-cigarette companies are owned in part by other major tobacco companies. In the modern era, these companies have been able to subvert previous restrictions by using new-found advertising methods, including social media and youth influencers. Tobacco companies view the youth demographic as a means to increase their lifetime customer base. They go out of their way to reach consumers in developing nations hoping to tighten and expand their grip on an already deeply addicted market. To respond to this crisis, public health organizations have been pushing to regulate the e-cigarette class of products the same as traditional tobacco products; this would hopefully subvert the efforts of tobacco companies to use modern media to reach easily influenced young consumers.

One study attempted to quantify the receptivity of never-smoking American adolescents to tobacco advertising. 41% of the 12- to 13-year-old participants were found to be receptive to at least one of the tobacco advertisements, and the highest response was for the media that included electronic cigarettes.[12] This evidence is concerning because the tobacco industry has historically relied on slowly building general interest among young consumers to cash in later when they come of age and develop full autonomy over their purchases. We know from historical industry documents that tobacco companies target young adults at major transition points in life including moving away from home, entering college, beginning new jobs, joining the military, and hanging out at bars.[13] At the same time as these major life changes, exposure to anti-tobacco public health efforts begin tapering off in this demographic. This reduces the resiliency of never or light smokers from progressing to heavier patterns of use. All of this further supports the idea that stricter regulatory measures towards e-cigarettes are required to protect susceptible adolescents and young adults from carefully crafted and targeted commercial advertising. Early evidence suggests the e-cigarette use in adolescents may lead to heavier cigarette smoking into adulthood.[14]

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Multidisciplinary cooperation and education can positively benefit patients and improve outcomes. The more members of the healthcare team asking about e-cigarette use and educating patients, the better. Most interventions will occur in the primary care setting where physicians, nurse practitioners, and pharmacists will discuss smoking cessation with patients. Each team member needs to be educated regarding the risks and benefits of electronic nicotine delivery devices. When questioning patients about their social history, it will be necessary for all team members to ask specifically about e-cigarette use as patients may not consider e-cigarettes to be harmful or in the same category as traditional cigarette smoking and thus may not disclose their use. Due to the rising popularity of these devices in the pediatric population, it is crucial to ask and educate about e-cigarettes during well-child exams. Some adolescences who would not have smoked may try e-cigarettes, which correlate with higher levels of smoking later in life. Interventions with adolescents aimed at smoking have demonstrated effectiveness in decreasing rates of e-cigarette users who later convert to traditional smoking.[15] [Level 1] Currently, traditional cigarette use has far more proven negative health consequences than e-cigarettes, but this is in part because of a lack of research. E-cigarettes are not benign. The adverse effects of nicotine found in e-cigarettes on the cardiovascular system and childhood neurologic development require emphasis. Finally, clinicians should recommend that the public quit smoking. There are no health benefits of smoking and individuals who would like to try vaping, should instead be offered methods of quitting smoking, altogether; not only does smoking discontinuation improve health, it saves money both for the individual and the healthcare system.

Only through a concerted effort by clinicians at all levels can the morbidity associated with smoking decrease. Patients require ongoing education that smoking is harmful to health, and a coordinated effort from all members of the interprofessional team can contribute to that goal. [Level V]

Nursing Actions and Interventions

Nurses will have an essential role in collecting and updating the social histories of patients and relaying any e-cigarette use to the healthcare team. The healthcare team needs to be aware of the risks and potential benefits of e-cigarettes and how they relate to patient care and health. 

Nursing Monitoring

Patients who use e-cigarettes heavily may need nicotine patches/replacement while in the hospital and may experience typical symptoms of nicotine withdrawal for which nurses must monitor. 

Interested in Participating?

We are looking for contributors to author, edit, and peer review our vast library of review articles and multiple choice questions. In as little as 2-3 hours you can make a significant contribution to your specialty. In return for a small amount of your time, you will receive free access to all content and you will be published as an author or editor in eBooks, apps, online CME/CE activities, and an online Learning Management System for students, teachers, and program directors that allows access to review materials in over 500 specialties.

Improve Content - Become an Author or Editor

This is an academic project designed to provide inexpensive peer-reviewed Apps, eBooks, and very soon an online CME/CE system to help students identify weaknesses and improve knowledge. We would like you to consider being an author or editor. Please click here to learn more. Thank you for you for your interest, the StatPearls Publishing Editorial Team.

Electronic Delivery (Vaping) Of Cannabis And Nicotine - Questions

Take a quiz of the questions on this article.

Take Quiz
A 16-year-old boy presents to the clinic for a routine physical examination. This summer, he will be working at a local amusement park and requires the appropriate documentation to be completed by his primary care provider. The patient has no significant past medical history and currently takes no medications. Physical examination reveals a healthy young boy who appears his stated age. When asked about social history, the patient denies any history of tobacco use. However, upon further questioning, it is revealed that the patient "just smokes his vape" at weekend parties. According to the recent studies, which of the following micro-constituents found within e-cigarette products is paired with the correct side-effect?

Click Your Answer Below

Would you like to access teaching points and more information on this topic?

Improve Content - Become an Author or Editor and get free access to the entire database, free eBooks, as well as free CME/CE as it becomes available. If interested, please click on "Sign Up" to register.

Purchase- Want immediate access to questions, answers, and teaching points? They can be purchased above at Apps and eBooks.

Sign Up
A 52-year-old woman presents to the outpatient clinic for a routine health visit. Since her previous visit this time last year, the patient has had no significant changes to her health. However, during the interview, she reveals that for the past month, she has felt progressively short of breath when doing her usual routine. In addition, she occasionally suffers from a non-productive cough after physical activity. She has a known 35-pack-year history but has been resistant to smoking cessation interventions in the past. In addition to working up her symptoms, she is encouraged to cut down her use of cigarettes. Nicotine replacement patches, gum, and varenicline are offered, but she refuses. The only treatment modality she is open to includes switching to e-cigarettes. Which of the following is most accurate regarding this smoking cessation treatment?

Click Your Answer Below

Would you like to access teaching points and more information on this topic?

Improve Content - Become an Author or Editor and get free access to the entire database, free eBooks, as well as free CME/CE as it becomes available. If interested, please click on "Sign Up" to register.

Purchase- Want immediate access to questions, answers, and teaching points? They can be purchased above at Apps and eBooks.

Sign Up
A 25-year-old male presents to the outpatient clinic for evaluation of a localized skin abscess. After collecting history and performing a physical exam, the clinician prescribes an oral antibiotic medication and performs small incision and drainage of the lesion. On his way out the door the patient says, "after that experience, I can't wait to smoke my vape." Which of the following is most accurate regarding the potential health risks this patient may face in the future?

Click Your Answer Below

Would you like to access teaching points and more information on this topic?

Improve Content - Become an Author or Editor and get free access to the entire database, free eBooks, as well as free CME/CE as it becomes available. If interested, please click on "Sign Up" to register.

Purchase- Want immediate access to questions, answers, and teaching points? They can be purchased above at Apps and eBooks.

Sign Up
A 37-year-old woman presents to the clinic for smoking cessation. She has a 15-pack-year history and has failed to quit in the past using abstinence-only methods. Significant past medical history includes hypertension, major depression, and bulimia nervosa. She would like to know what her best options are for quitting smoking. Which of the following is the best treatment modality to begin in this patient?

Click Your Answer Below

Would you like to access teaching points and more information on this topic?

Improve Content - Become an Author or Editor and get free access to the entire database, free eBooks, as well as free CME/CE as it becomes available. If interested, please click on "Sign Up" to register.

Purchase- Want immediate access to questions, answers, and teaching points? They can be purchased above at Apps and eBooks.

Sign Up
A 16-year-old boy presents to the clinic for a routine physical. He has a past medical history of childhood asthma controlled with PRN albuterol and has no concerns at today's visit. The patient's mother is accompanying him today and has some questions regarding e-cigarettes. She is a high school teacher and has noticed a profound increase in the usage of these devices at her school. She sees many kids vaping outside before and after classes. Sometimes she sees students using the devices during class when she has her back turned. She is very concerned that her own son will begin to use these devices and would like to know how this became a problem and what she can do to prevent her son from using. Which of the following is the most accurate piece of advice?

Click Your Answer Below

Would you like to access teaching points and more information on this topic?

Improve Content - Become an Author or Editor and get free access to the entire database, free eBooks, as well as free CME/CE as it becomes available. If interested, please click on "Sign Up" to register.

Purchase- Want immediate access to questions, answers, and teaching points? They can be purchased above at Apps and eBooks.

Sign Up

Electronic Delivery (Vaping) Of Cannabis And Nicotine - References


Dinakar Ch,O’Connor GT, The Health Effects of Electronic Cigarettes. The New England journal of medicine. 2016 Dec 29;     [PubMed]
Hajek P,Phillips-Waller A,Przulj D,Pesola F,Myers Smith K,Bisal N,Li J,Parrott S,Sasieni P,Dawkins L,Ross L,Goniewicz M,Wu Q,McRobbie HJ, A Randomized Trial of E-Cigarettes versus Nicotine-Replacement Therapy. The New England journal of medicine. 2019 Feb 14;     [PubMed]
Soneji S,Barrington-Trimis JL,Wills TA,Leventhal AM,Unger JB,Gibson LA,Yang J,Primack BA,Andrews JA,Miech RA,Spindle TR,Dick DM,Eissenberg T,Hornik RC,Dang R,Sargent JD, Association Between Initial Use of e-Cigarettes and Subsequent Cigarette Smoking Among Adolescents and Young Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA pediatrics. 2017 Aug 1;     [PubMed]
McConnell R,Barrington-Trimis JL,Wang K,Urman R,Hong H,Unger J,Samet J,Leventhal A,Berhane K, Electronic Cigarette Use and Respiratory Symptoms in Adolescents. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2017 Apr 15;     [PubMed]
Qasim H,Karim ZA,Rivera JO,Khasawneh FT,Alshbool FZ, Impact of Electronic Cigarettes on the Cardiovascular System. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2017 Aug 30;     [PubMed]
Jenssen BP,Boykan R, Electronic Cigarettes and Youth in the United States: A Call to Action (at the Local, National and Global Levels). Children (Basel, Switzerland). 2019 Feb 20;     [PubMed]
Barrington-Trimis JL,Leventhal AM, Adolescents' Use of     [PubMed]
Prochaska JJ, The public health consequences of e-cigarettes: a review by the National Academies of Sciences. A call for more research, a need for regulatory action. Addiction (Abingdon, England). 2019 Apr;     [PubMed]
Goldenson NI,Kirkpatrick MG,Barrington-Trimis JL,Pang RD,McBeth JF,Pentz MA,Samet JM,Leventhal AM, Effects of sweet flavorings and nicotine on the appeal and sensory properties of e-cigarettes among young adult vapers: Application of a novel methodology. Drug and alcohol dependence. 2016 Nov 1;     [PubMed]
Rigotti NA, Balancing the Benefits and Harms of E-Cigarettes: A National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine Report. Annals of internal medicine. 2018 May 1;     [PubMed]
Pierce JP,Sargent JD,White MM,Borek N,Portnoy DB,Green VR,Kaufman AR,Stanton CA,Bansal-Travers M,Strong DR,Pearson JL,Coleman BN,Leas E,Noble ML,Trinidad DR,Moran MB,Carusi C,Hyland A,Messer K, Receptivity to Tobacco Advertising and Susceptibility to Tobacco Products. Pediatrics. 2017 Jun;     [PubMed]
Ling PM,Glantz SA, Why and how the tobacco industry sells cigarettes to young adults: evidence from industry documents. American journal of public health. 2002 Jun;     [PubMed]
Leventhal AM,Stone MD,Andrabi N,Barrington-Trimis J,Strong DR,Sussman S,Audrain-McGovern J, Association of e-Cigarette Vaping and Progression to Heavier Patterns of Cigarette Smoking. JAMA. 2016 Nov 8;     [PubMed]
England LJ,Bunnell RE,Pechacek TF,Tong VT,McAfee TA, Nicotine and the Developing Human: A Neglected Element in the Electronic Cigarette Debate. American journal of preventive medicine. 2015 Aug;     [PubMed]
Conner M,Grogan S,Simms-Ellis R,Flett K,Sykes-Muskett B,Cowap L,Lawton R,Armitage C,Meads D,Schmitt L,Torgerson C,West R,Siddiqi K, Evidence that an intervention weakens the relationship between adolescent electronic cigarette use and tobacco smoking: a 24-month prospective study. Tobacco control. 2019 Jun 28     [PubMed]


The intent of StatPearls is to provide practice questions and explanations to assist you in identifying and resolving knowledge deficits. These questions and explanations are not intended to be a source of the knowledge base of all of medicine, nor is it intended to be a board or certification review of CNS-Public Community Health. The authors or editors do not warrant the information is complete or accurate. The reader is encouraged to verify each answer and explanation in several references. All drug indications and dosages should be verified before administration.

StatPearls offers the most comprehensive database of free multiple-choice questions with explanations and short review chapters ever developed. This system helps physicians, medical students, dentists, nurses, pharmacists, and allied health professionals identify education deficits and learn new concepts. StatPearls is not a board or certification review system for CNS-Public Community Health, it is a learning system that you can use to help improve your knowledge base of medicine for life-long learning. StatPearls will help you identify your weaknesses so that when you are ready to study for a board or certification exam in CNS-Public Community Health, you will already be prepared.

Our content is updated continuously through a multi-step peer review process that will help you be prepared and review for a thorough knowledge of CNS-Public Community Health. When it is time for the CNS-Public Community Health board and certification exam, you will already be ready. Besides online study quizzes, we also publish our peer-reviewed content in eBooks and mobile Apps. We also offer inexpensive CME/CE, so our content can be used to attain education credits while you study CNS-Public Community Health.