Chronic Transplantation Rejection


Article Author:
Angel Justiz Vaillant
Abdul Waheed


Article Editor:
Michael Mohseni


Editors In Chief:
Timothy Craig
Yoon Kim
Robert Hostoffer


Managing Editors:
Avais Raja
Orawan Chaigasame
Carrie Smith
Abdul Waheed
Khalid Alsayouri
Trevor Nezwek
Radia Jamil
Patrick Le
Anoosh Zafar Gondal
Saad Nazir
William Gossman
Hassam Zulfiqar
Steve Bhimji
John Shell
Matthew Varacallo
Heba Mahdy
Ahmad Malik
Sarosh Vaqar
Mark Pellegrini
James Hughes
Beata Beatty
Beenish Sohail
Nazia Sadiq
Hajira Basit
Phillip Hynes
Tehmina Warsi


Updated:
6/18/2019 5:51:08 PM

Introduction

Transplant rejection can be classified as hyperacute, acute, or chronic. Hyperacute rejection is usually caused by specific antibodies against the graft and occurs within minutes or hours after grafting. Acute rejection occurs days or weeks after transplantation and can be caused by specific lymphocytes in the recipient that recognize HLA antigens in the tissue or organ grafted. Finally, chronic rejection usually occurs months or years after organ or tissue transplantation. Various mechanisms involving chronic inflammation, humoral, and cellular immune reactions play an essential role in the immunopathogenesis of chronic rejection.

Etiology

The etiology of chronic rejection is incompletely understood. Glinton et al. reported that a vital determinant of the complication of chronic solid organ allografts is by a vascular disease component of the transplanted graft. Their review, however, focused on cardiac transplantation only. In cardiac allograft vasculopathy, histologic evidence suggests that accumulation and activation of phagocytes can be a contributing factor. Phagocytic cells such as macrophages, monocytes, and immature dendritic cell subsets are found in this type of chronic cardiac transplant rejection. Furthermore, myeloid phagocytes crosstalk with B and T lymphocytes while also signaling and activating vascular smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts, and these can cause fibrous intimal thickening.[1] Chronic renal allograft rejection has been labeled as interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy to help reflect the underlying histology and etiology. Chronic rejection is now cited as the leading cause of graft rejection.

Epidemiology

The overall incidence and prevalence of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) in biopsies of renal allograft tissues depends on the timing and the indication of such graft biopsies. In protocol biopsies, in the first year post-transplantation, it has been reported that the prevalence can be as high as 94% (Grade I) and up to 100% after 10 years. 

In the United States, mortality in patients on chronic hemodialysis is significantly higher in winter months than in the summer. It is unknown whether a seasonal difference exists, however, for mortality or graft failure among kidney transplant recipients. One report showed that there was a significant annual variation of deaths due to graft failures.[2]

Pathophysiology

Chronic allograft rejection can be caused by antibody-dependent complement activation lesions as well as cell arteritis leading to the development of interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IF/TA).[3] This injury can appear early after transplantation. At 1-year post-transplant, greater than 81% of the kidneys have minimal lesions of IF/TA that tend to progress over time; these lesions affect greater than 50% of transplanted kidneys with severe lesions at 5 years.

The 2011 Banff meeting focused on diagnostic criteria for late-antibody mediated rejection.  In this review, there was the recognition of CD4-negative antibody-mediated rejection, in which endothelial activation and NK cells were suggested as the primary causes of chronic reaction.[4] Other proposed pathophysiologic mechanisms include:

  • Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) toxicity
  • Chronic dysfunction of the solid organ causing premature graft loss
  • Alloimmunization to minor HLA antigens
  • Production of interferon gamma and IL-2 by Th1 lymphocytes
  • Secretion of cytokines by endothelial cells

Histopathology

The main histological finding in biopsies of rejected organs is arteriosclerosis that causes a progressive luminal narrowing of graft vessels. This is typically referred to as a vasculopathy or graft vascular disease. This entity is often accompanied by graft tissue (parenchymal) fibrosis.[5] For example, livers with chronic rejection show a decreased number of bile ducts on biopsy and obliteration of small arteries. Correspondingly, lung rejection is characterized by bronchiolitis obliterans.

History and Physical

Individuals presenting with chronic transplant rejection will have had a previous history of an organ or tissue transplantation (for example, kidney, liver, and lung) for any of many chronic medical conditions. The symptoms and signs of rejections depend on the organ transplanted; for instance, a chronic kidney rejection causes fatigue, fever, flu-like symptoms, anuria or decreased urine output, generalized edema, and pain or tenderness at the site of transplantation. Other signs and symptoms of organ rejection can include:

  • Jaundice
  • Dark urine
  • Itching
  • Nausea and vomiting
  • Abdominal swelling or tenderness
  • Cough, shortness of breath
  • Recurrent infections
  • Arterial hypertension
  • Proteinuria
  • Fatigue
  • Weight gain 
  • Premature death
  • Anorexia
  • Anemia
  • Opportunistic neoplasia
  • Pulmonary edema
  • Atherosclerosis

Evaluation

Various laboratory tests can be ordered to test for chronic rejection. These may include the following:

  • Twenty-four-hour urine collection
  • Blood chemistry
  • Complete blood cell count
  • Electrocardiogram
  • Chest x-ray
  • CT (computed tomography) of the abdomen
  • Abdominal ultrasonography
  • Histological studies
  • HLA typing (This will test for histocompatibility between donor and recipient. The most critical loci are HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-DR.)
  • Serology (testing for HIV; hepatitis B and C)

In renal transplantation, urinary samples can prove useful to determine rejection.  Tubular epithelial cells, casts, oxalate crystals (sand-glass shaped), dirty background, increasing erythrocyturia, mixed cell clusters, lymphocytes, and mitoses all may be observed.

"Owl-eye" cells milk-glass nuclei, sometimes with eosinophilic condensation, typically characterize cytologic examination of the voided urine in CMV infection.[6] Serological tests can further help in differentiating CMV-infection from allograft rejection.

Treatment / Management

The treatment of organ rejection depends on the type of injury and underlying etiology. In chronic kidney rejection, complications including arterial hypertension, pulmonary edema, and uremia should be managed through various therapeutic options, including but not limited to hemodialysis, hemofiltration, and the use of diuretics.

As a general statement, most infectious causes should be treated with specific, directed antimicrobials.

In diabetic nephropathy, the albumin to creatinine ratio can be used to guide therapy.  If this ratio is greater than 3, inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system is recommended with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB). This therapy should be pursued even in the setting of normal blood pressure to help protect the donor's kidney.

Tight glucose control is recommended in the setting of hyperglycemia.  In type 1 diabetes mellitus, therapy is typically accomplished with insulin, and in non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus, therapy is usually with a biguanide or sulfonylurea.

In end-stage rejection, there may be a consideration for re-transplantation of the organ or tissues.

Differential Diagnosis

The differential diagnosis for chronic rejection is broad but includes acute rejection, infection (CMV), medication toxicity (immunosuppressants), posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease, or technical problems with vascular or structural anastomotic complications.

Pertinent Studies and Ongoing Trials

The FTY720 (Fingolimod) is a novel immunosuppressive agent that has been investigated in the last few decades. FTY is highly effective in prolonging graft survival in preclinical models of transplantation and multiple sclerosis. FTY720 is an immunomodulator. Its mode of action differs completely from traditional immunosuppressants. It is a new class of drugs named sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor (S1P-R) modulators.[7][8] In laboratory animals S1P receptor activation with fingolimod activates anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic pathways, leading to improved myocardial salvage by reducing cardiac fibrosis.[9]

ASP0028, an S1P1/S1P5-selective agonist, with comparable efficacy to FTY720 and wider safety margins than FTY720 showed the efficacy and safety when it was co-administered with suboptimal-dose of tacrolimus in a monkey renal transplantation model. ASP0028 administration remarkably reduced peripheral lymphocytes, including subsets of CD4+/ or CD8+/naive and memory cells, CD4+/Treg cells, and B cells, but not CD4+/ or CD8+/effector memory cells and natural killer (NK) cells. These data support the finding that ASP0028 and tacrolimus prolong renal allograft survival in primates.[7]

Staging

Banff grading system is a classification of the severity of chronic renal allograft nephropathy. This was originally implemented in 1997 and updated subsequently in 2005, 2007, 2009, 2013, and 2017.[3][4] This schema grades disease severity according to interstitial fibrosis, atrophy and loss of tubules (IF/TA):

  • Grade I: Mild fibrosis of the interstitium and mild atrophy of the tubules, either with or without specific glomerular or vascular findings that can suggest chronic allograft nephropathy.
  • Grade II: Moderate interstitial fibrosis (affecting 25% to 50% of the cortical area) and moderate tubular atrophy (involving 26% to 50% of the area of the cortical tubules). 
  • Grade III: Severe interstitial fibrosis (affecting greater than 50 percent of the cortical area) and tubular atrophy (involving greater than 50% of the area of the cortical tubules).

Prognosis

As many as one-third of cadaveric kidney transplant recipients suffer graft loss within 5 years of transplantation.

Unfortunately, changes in immunotherapy have proven to be mostly ineffective in changing the prognosis for patients with established chronic allograft nephropathy.

Prevention, early diagnosis, management of both co-morbidity and complications of chronic kidney disease can improve the survival of patients with transplant failure.

Complications

The success of organ transplantation depends on the use of immunosuppressive drugs to control the alloimmune response. The most frequent drugs used for kidney transplantation include a cocktail of 3 medications including a drug that inhibits T-cell activation (cyclosporin, tacrolimus, or sirolimus), an antiproliferative (6-mercaptopurine, or mycophenolic acid) and an anti-inflammatory agent (corticosteroids). 

Chronic organ rejection can be associated with a high mortality rate and may result in various complications, including kidney failure, liver failure, chronic pulmonary disease, pancreatic insufficiency, arteriosclerosis, and blood dyscrasias.

Other complications include CMV infection and infectious diseases caused by bacterial, viral, fungal, protozoal or mixed. Excessive immunosuppression can cause the emergence of BK polyomavirus resulting in BK nephropathy and may account for one to ten percent of allograft failure.

A late complication of renal transplantation is the recurrence of the original disease (diabetic nephropathy).

Development of malignancy is a late complication of chronic organ rejection. For example, the incidence of lymphoma is approximately 40 times greater in transplant recipients than in the general population. Other tumors that may be observed include skin cancer, Kaposi sarcoma and lymphoma due to Epstein-Barr virus activation.

Deterrence and Patient Education

It is mandatory for patients to be compliant with immunosuppressive drugs to avoid organ rejection and improve the quality of life. Similarly, patients must also comply with the treatment of any underlying comorbidities.

Pearls and Other Issues

  • Use of immunosuppressant in chronic rejection does not adequately prevent it. High dosages may be used without an observable therapeutic response. This suggests that chronic rejection may involve many other mechanisms rather than only immunological pathways. Until we fully understand the pathophysiology and immunopathogenesis of this rejection, we cannot create novel therapeutic interventions to tackle this problem.
  • The better the HLA matching between donor and recipient, the more successful the organ transplant will be and over a longer period.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

An interprofessional team educates and manage the patient with chronic rejection. Since this condition is life-threatening, the health care providers should advise the patient fully about all other treatment options, psychological support, and in extreme circumstances, consideration for an organ or tissue re-transplantation.


Interested in Participating?

We are looking for contributors to author, edit, and peer review our vast library of review articles and multiple choice questions. In as little as 2-3 hours you can make a significant contribution to your specialty. In return for a small amount of your time, you will receive free access to all content and you will be published as an author or editor in eBooks, apps, online CME/CE activities, and an online Learning Management System for students, teachers, and program directors that allows access to review materials in over 500 specialties.

Improve Content - Become an Author or Editor

This is an academic project designed to provide inexpensive peer-reviewed Apps, eBooks, and very soon an online CME/CE system to help students identify weaknesses and improve knowledge. We would like you to consider being an author or editor. Please click here to learn more. Thank you for you for your interest, the StatPearls Publishing Editorial Team.

Chronic Transplantation Rejection - Questions

Take a quiz of the questions on this article.

Take Quiz
A 65-year-old female with a history of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis received a lung transplant 3 years ago. She presents with a four-month history of increasing dyspnea on exertion. She has been compliant with her medications which include prednisone, tacrolimus, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and mycophenolate mofetil. A lung exam shows crackles at her native lung and decreased breath sounds at the transplanted lung. Pulmonary function tests show that FEV1 has dropped 40 percent since last year. Select the treatment most likely to benefit this patient.



Click Your Answer Below


Would you like to access teaching points and more information on this topic?

Improve Content - Become an Author or Editor and get free access to the entire database, free eBooks, as well as free CME/CE as it becomes available. If interested, please click on "Sign Up" to register.

Purchase- Want immediate access to questions, answers, and teaching points? They can be purchased above at Apps and eBooks.


Sign Up
When does chronic transplant rejection occur?



Click Your Answer Below


Would you like to access teaching points and more information on this topic?

Improve Content - Become an Author or Editor and get free access to the entire database, free eBooks, as well as free CME/CE as it becomes available. If interested, please click on "Sign Up" to register.

Purchase- Want immediate access to questions, answers, and teaching points? They can be purchased above at Apps and eBooks.


Sign Up
Chronic renal allograft rejection is more appropriately referred to as what?



Click Your Answer Below


Would you like to access teaching points and more information on this topic?

Improve Content - Become an Author or Editor and get free access to the entire database, free eBooks, as well as free CME/CE as it becomes available. If interested, please click on "Sign Up" to register.

Purchase- Want immediate access to questions, answers, and teaching points? They can be purchased above at Apps and eBooks.


Sign Up
All of the following can be signs or symptoms of chronic transplantation rejection except which one?



Click Your Answer Below


Would you like to access teaching points and more information on this topic?

Improve Content - Become an Author or Editor and get free access to the entire database, free eBooks, as well as free CME/CE as it becomes available. If interested, please click on "Sign Up" to register.

Purchase- Want immediate access to questions, answers, and teaching points? They can be purchased above at Apps and eBooks.


Sign Up
All of the following are helpful in the management of chronic renal allograft rejection except which one?



Click Your Answer Below


Would you like to access teaching points and more information on this topic?

Improve Content - Become an Author or Editor and get free access to the entire database, free eBooks, as well as free CME/CE as it becomes available. If interested, please click on "Sign Up" to register.

Purchase- Want immediate access to questions, answers, and teaching points? They can be purchased above at Apps and eBooks.


Sign Up

Chronic Transplantation Rejection - References

References

Glinton K,DeBerge M,Yeap XY,Zhang J,Forbess J,Luo X,Thorp EB, Acute and chronic phagocyte determinants of cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Seminars in immunopathology. 2018 Nov     [PubMed]
Astor BC,Melamed ML,Mandelbrot DA,Djamali A, Seasonality of mortality and graft failure among kidney transplant recipients in the US - a retrospective study. Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation. 2018 Mar     [PubMed]
Solez K,Colvin RB,Racusen LC,Sis B,Halloran PF,Birk PE,Campbell PM,Cascalho M,Collins AB,Demetris AJ,Drachenberg CB,Gibson IW,Grimm PC,Haas M,Lerut E,Liapis H,Mannon RB,Marcus PB,Mengel M,Mihatsch MJ,Nankivell BJ,Nickeleit V,Papadimitriou JC,Platt JL,Randhawa P,Roberts I,Salinas-Madriga L,Salomon DR,Seron D,Sheaff M,Weening JJ, Banff '05 Meeting Report: differential diagnosis of chronic allograft injury and elimination of chronic allograft nephropathy ('CAN'). American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. 2007 Mar     [PubMed]
Mengel M,Sis B,Haas M,Colvin RB,Halloran PF,Racusen LC,Solez K,Cendales L,Demetris AJ,Drachenberg CB,Farver CF,Rodriguez ER,Wallace WD,Glotz D, Banff 2011 Meeting report: new concepts in antibody-mediated rejection. American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. 2012 Mar     [PubMed]
Kloc M,Ghobrial RM, Chronic allograft rejection: A significant hurdle to transplant success. Burns     [PubMed]
Winkelmann M,Grabensee B,Pfitzer P, Differential diagnosis of acute allograft rejection and CMV-infection in renal transplantation by urinary cytology. Pathology, research and practice. 1985 Aug     [PubMed]
Dun H,Song L,Ma A,Hu Y,Zeng L,Bai J,Zhang G,Zhang L,Koide K,Okada Y,Hanaoka K,Yamamoto R,Hirose J,Morokata T,Daloze P,Chen H, ASP0028 in combination with suboptimal-dose of tacrolimus in Cynomolgus monkey renal transplantation model. Transplant immunology. 2017 Feb     [PubMed]
Budde K,Schütz M,Glander P,Peters H,Waiser J,Liefeldt L,Neumayer HH,Böhler T, FTY720 (fingolimod) in renal transplantation. Clinical transplantation. 2006     [PubMed]
Ahmed N,Linardi D,Muhammad N,Chiamulera C,Fumagalli G,Biagio LS,Gebrie MA,Aslam M,Luciani GB,Faggian G,Rungatscher A, Sphingosine 1-Phosphate Receptor Modulator Fingolimod (FTY720) Attenuates Myocardial Fibrosis in Post-heterotopic Heart Transplantation. Frontiers in pharmacology. 2017     [PubMed]

Disclaimer

The intent of StatPearls is to provide practice questions and explanations to assist you in identifying and resolving knowledge deficits. These questions and explanations are not intended to be a source of the knowledge base of all of medicine, nor is it intended to be a board or certification review of Allergy and Immunology. The authors or editors do not warrant the information is complete or accurate. The reader is encouraged to verify each answer and explanation in several references. All drug indications and dosages should be verified before administration.

StatPearls offers the most comprehensive database of free multiple-choice questions with explanations and short review chapters ever developed. This system helps physicians, medical students, dentists, nurses, pharmacists, and allied health professionals identify education deficits and learn new concepts. StatPearls is not a board or certification review system for Allergy and Immunology, it is a learning system that you can use to help improve your knowledge base of medicine for life-long learning. StatPearls will help you identify your weaknesses so that when you are ready to study for a board or certification exam in Allergy and Immunology, you will already be prepared.

Our content is updated continuously through a multi-step peer review process that will help you be prepared and review for a thorough knowledge of Allergy and Immunology. When it is time for the Allergy and Immunology board and certification exam, you will already be ready. Besides online study quizzes, we also publish our peer-reviewed content in eBooks and mobile Apps. We also offer inexpensive CME/CE, so our content can be used to attain education credits while you study Allergy and Immunology.